John Hudson wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "keith_w" <keith_w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, 25 May, 2006 06:30 AM
> Subject: [OM] Re: monitors
[...]
>> A short comment:
>> I live in the U.S. so I can verify part of what you say, at least! <g>
>>
>> I replaced a 13-year OLD Sony 27" Trinitron (CRT) which was definitely on
>> its last legs with a new flat screen Panasonic 32" LCD.
>> At the same time, I signed up to receive Hi-Definition reception, via
>> satellite.
>> We are extremely satisfied with the doubling of the resolution given by HD
>> television. It's a whole new world of viewing!
> but do football field sized flat screens improve the inherent quality of
> programming or do they just provide more canvas for the banality of 99.9% of
> US television output?
Oh dear me! I'd rather not get started on the wasteland called commercial
television!
Your comment is accurate, as far as I'm concerned.
If I plan to watch any television at all, regardless of the source, I like to
have the "canvas" as you call it, be as user-friendly as possible. Within the
limits previously mentioned...
keith
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|