As the popping version has clearer (stunning) colours, that one has a first
appearance of /better/ but I guess the first version is more how the view
was in reality. My vote is for the original look.
/ Johan
Den 06-02-21 10.45, skrev "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> It has a soft quality to the light. I would check what it looks like
> with more edge contrast and midtone contrast. I've tried that
> <http://moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Cathedral.htm>. The altered
> version is as far as I can see it going without definitely going too
> far. If it were mine, I would probably end up somewhere between the way
> you present it and my 'pop" version. Somebody sugested use of filter(s)
> to get more pop, I like to do it in the "darkroom".
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|