Hello Jeff my friend!
Wow what a bunch of die hards there are here, I love it!
You suggested the Tamron 35-70 and 80-200 years ago and there still amazing!
It was a fast test and the Tamron did admirably!
I have a Zuiko 21 f/2 and an 18 3.5 on the way to me this week!
Can't wait to test them on my Canon 1DMK2
When I put them on my OM 2n I laugh with joy how wide they are on a one to
one view finder.
The view finder on the old OM's are so big compared to the modern digitals.
Daniel Danrich
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jeff Keller
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 10:22 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200 test shot
The image on the right seems to have the least DOF and a different color
cast. The highlights at the top of the jar are different suggesting the
lighting changed slightly. Does the lens have a different color cast? The
leaf(?) at the bottom left of the jar seems to be missing. Was it in a
different position?
The middle image seems to have the most DOF. It appears all three images
were at different apertures? You should have used your OM-2n, it would have
kept the aperture constant ;^)
-jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: danrich7
>
>
> This is a test shot using the Canon 70-200 2.8 Canon 200 1.8
> and the Tamron 80-200 2.8 The Canon 70-200 in considered a
> 4.1 out of 5 The Canon 200 1.8 in considered a 4.8 out of 5
> Note how well the Tamron did on the Canon 1DMK2
> http://danrich.smugmug.com/gallery/297847/1/35452997/Original
>
> Daniel Danrich
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|