Thanks, and I suppose I should have recognized that. From a practical
standpoint it looks like an empty restaurant or owners and staff only.
Chuck Norcutt
Walt Wayman wrote:
> Let me quickly correct my own post. I was distracted by -- well,
> that's nobody's business but my own. Suffice to say, I had good
> cause to be so.
>
> Strike the word "commercial" from my response. ANY commercial use of
> a photograph requires a release from any recognizable person therein.
> I don't know how that word crept into what I wrote.
>
> Taking photographs without prior permission of people who have a
> legitimate expectation of being left alone and unmolested, as those
> in a restaurant have at least a minimally recognized quasi-right to
> expect, could result in unhappy consequences, either immediately, via
> confrontation and/or a punch in the snout, perhaps even an attempted
> insertaion of photographic apparatus into one or more orifices, or
> subsequently through the endeavors of practitioners licensed to speak
> and advocate for others in a court of law.
>
> Walt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|