In general, I find it quite useless to review the sample images at dpreview,
because they are all terrible. Almost without exception they are all
terribly composed and the outdoors shots are usually pictures of nothing
taken at mid day with contrasty sun. For instance, if you were to look at
the E-1 sample images at dpreview, you'd think the camera joke because all
the images are bad. Though, if you were to look at the best images on
myfourthirds.com <http://myfourthirds.com>, you'd have exactly the opposite
conclusion.
That said, I like the fact that dpreview often presents technical
information in a more coherent manner than even the manufactures often do.
Robert Swier
Toronto, Canada
On 9/15/05, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A Canon shooting friend suggested that the fringing in this case was
> probably due to the 24-105 lens and to check the shots done on the 1DS
> Mark II (17 MP full frame). After digging around on dpreview again I
> find that fringing is not evident in a somewhat comparable image from
> the 1DS Mark II shot with the 17-40 L4 at 23mm. Image #10 at
> <http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/?gallery=canoneos1dsmkii_preview/>
> (caution, the sample is 11MB)
>
> So, it probably is the lens. Apart from specific lens quality issues
> the 24-105 was shooting at its shortest FL setting while the 17-40 was
> shooting in its mid-range.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|