Subject: | [OM] Re: Telecentricity |
---|---|
From: | ClassicVW@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:23:40 EDT |
I know it's been discussed, and I came to this discussion late... I was commenting on the seemingly large enough mount size, not the glass design. I apologize if I iam nferring something that's not correct. I thought the mount was wide enough to possibly cover future 35mm size sensors. Something that could possibly change with future changes in sensor design? George S. adacey@xxxxxxxxx writes: But the current DZ's are designed to cover the 4/3 sensor but won't cover 35mm right? If Olympus went to a larger sensor that required all new glass I can't see it being much of a draw. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Scott's totally subjective 'new E-1' report [windy], IanG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Telecentricity, Geilfuss Charles |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Telecentricity, Earl Dunbar |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Telecentricity, Andrew Dacey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |