As Moose mentioned, may be the 21/3.5. The Zuiko F2 wides does not work very
well with image sensors. I believe smaller aperture lenses work better on
DSLR, the large aperture one seems not even stopped down, I have seen a
Japanese site test the F2 wide on E-1, it was not that great.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Is this why many are snapping up Olympus wides (21 especially) for use on
> Can*ns?
>
> John Hermanson
> Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
> 21 South Lane, Huntington, NY 11743
> 631-424-2121 | omtech@xxxxxxxxx
> www.zuiko.com
> Factory Trained OM Service since 1977
> __________________________________
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Seems that C*non already removed this sample, I can only got the other
>> three. My friend told me the corners were very soft, typical C*non wide
>> angle performance, except the 17-40 which is the best among other C*nons
>> (but my sample was not that sharp in close distance and the long end).
>> That's why poeple spending 3-4K on a Cont*x 21/2.8 to be used on C*non
>> DSLR.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|