On 8/24/05, C.H.Ling <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Seems that C*non already removed this sample, I can only got the other
> three. My friend told me the corners were very soft, typical C*non wide
> angle performance, except the 17-40 which is the best among other C*nons
> (but my sample was not that sharp in close distance and the long end).
> That's why poeple spending 3-4K on a Cont*x 21/2.8 to be used on C*non DSLR.
Weird, I still see 4 images. I don't notice that much light falloff in
the corners (granted I'm at work using a non-calibrated display) but
there's definitely a noticeable softness in the bottom corners
(probably in the top corners too but it doesn't really show up that
well in the sky).
I was a bit surprised that they didn't show a wider variety of lenses.
I know it's only meant to be a few sample shots but why not include
another lens instead of 2 shots with the 85/1.8?
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|