Not so tiny/pancake at f2.
--- Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> And there is the Pentax *IST DS or DL with their 43mm 1.9. If
> concerned with a similar angle of view as the Oly with pancake, every
> manufacturer makes a 28mm lens that is equivalent in view about 40mm
> on a digital. The low priced Canon digital SLRs are both about the
> same size as an OM. You could even plunk a tiny Oly 21mm on an E-300
> with an adaptor.
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Daniel Sepke wrote:
>
> > The closest you'll get size wise is the Epson R-D1 and VC 35/2.5
> > pancake. Of
> > course not in everyone's price bracket and it is a RF camera. Close
> > but....
> >
> > Dan S.
> >
> > From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf
> > Of R.Jackson
> > Subject: [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)
> >
> > It would be nice to have something comparable to an OM with a pancake
> > lens in the digital marketplace.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|