| Subject: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...) |
|---|---|
| From: | AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:01:17 -0700 (PDT) |
> It would be nice to have something comparable to an OM with a
> pancake lens in the digital marketplace.
Actually, if you look at the high-end prosumers, it exists
today.
Otherwise, slap a 35/2.8 or 40/2 on the E-1/E-300 and enjoy.
AG
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...), Daniel Sepke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: My bag ... Was: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...), Chris Barker |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...), Daniel Sepke |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...), Winsor Crosby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |