Subject: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa? |
---|---|
From: | Andrew L Wendelborn <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:43:23 +0930 |
At 8:58 PM +1000 2005.07.18, Andrew Fildes wrote: > > >Which begs the question - the very non-OM question - does the 120 >XP2s behave any differently than 35mm? >AndrewF Can't say for sure, but I did get good results from a roll taken at EI 100 in a mju-2. regards Andrew ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, Andrew Fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, jking |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, Andrew Fildes |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, jking |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |