Subject: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa? |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:58:25 +1000 |
On 18/07/2005, at 8:56 PM, Andrew L Wendelborn wrote: > > I had a roll in one camera for a very long time. So long that I forgot > what was in it and exposed the last six exposures (half the 120 roll) > at 100 ASA (and one at 50 ASA). > Which begs the question - the very non-OM question - does the 120 XP2s behave any differently than 35mm? AndrewF > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, Andrew L Wendelborn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, Andrew L Wendelborn |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, Andrew L Wendelborn |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: ilford xp2 super 400 asa or 100 asa?, Andrew L Wendelborn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |