Subject: | [OM] Re: Sigma 600mm mirror lens |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:27:29 -0700 |
Andrew L Wendelborn wrote: >Interested in opinions. > >How does it compare (image quality wise) with > > i) 300/4.5 + 2XA > > Almost forgot. My TOPE 20 shot was taken with the 300/4.5 and 2xA. The nature of the shot is such that I'm afraid it doesn't tell you much about the lens qualities you may be concerned about. It's a much larger and more unwieldy lens than the mirrors, but has normal highlights and one may adjust the aperture for DOF. Moose ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 28/2 vs. 28/3.5 opinions, Earl Dunbar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Zuiko 28/2 vs. 28/3.5 opinions, Ali |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Sigma 600mm mirror lens - ooops!, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Sigma 600mm mirror lens, Earl Dunbar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |