Subject: | [OM] Re: Apertures, where is f22 ? |
---|---|
From: | swisspace <swisspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 08 Jun 2005 10:37:44 +0200 |
This is where I hope my investment in the 180f2 comes into it's own, the 180F2 is also a macro lens well it goes to 1:2 . now on the E-1 it becomes a 360f2 macro and with the 1.4x teleconvertor a 500f2.8 macro. So if my theory is correct you should get a deeper depth of field for a given subject, although after just writing this down I am not so convinced this will be the case, First thing I will be trying though, when my adapter arrives. Ian W John A. Lind wrote: > > The 50/3.5 stops down to f/22 and the 135/4.5 stops down to f/45 to allow > the greater depth of field when it's desired at high magnification . . . > the trade-off being some softening from aperture diffraction to gain > additional depth of field. With high magnification macros, something is > either in or out of the depth of field; there's nearly zero "boundary" zone > before it's unmistakably out of focus. > > -- John Lind > > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: An English apology !, swisspace |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Proofreading, John Nelson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Apertures, where is f22 ?, Moose |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Apertures, where is f22 ?, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |