>
> Has she forgiven you yet?
Probably not !
> The main problem with full fish portraits is avoiding that
> look - the
> one that says - 'the lens is 5cm from my nose - what ARE you doing?'
> Then there's the difficulty of keeping your own feet out of it, hey
> Wayne?
Yeah, just have to compose the shot with that in mind.
> I think that your example is deficient in the internal paintwork - I
> haven't seen other users complain and that effect would certainly
> cause complaint! Looks like reflection from the edge of the front
> element back on to the film due to poor element edge paint. Or none.
> It is repairable in Photoshop - at the same time as you are masking
> out the edge effects (and your feet) - but it isn't acceptable. Too
> late to return it?
I don't think it's just my example, I've seen a few examples on the 'net
with the same problem, probably just sloppy manufacturing. Just had a look
at the lens itself and the front element looks ok (yeah, the coating must be
a bit uneven as the reflection colours change as you rotate the lens on it's
axis), but the rear element(s) appear to reflect a bit at the edges, maybe
that's the cause.
...Wayne
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|