Subject: | [OM] Re: RAW |
---|---|
From: | "John A. Lind" <jalind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:56:38 -0500 |
At 06:04 PM 4/28/2005, Joel Wilcox wrote: >The lovely thing is RAW is easy and very well-supported on the E-1. I >really do like it a lot. But I get lazy with it once in a while and have >expected the converter to fix my errors, rather than concentrate on using >the camera's considerable smarts. My goal is now to get perfect exposures, >regardless of format. > >Joel W. I believe part of "The Dream" being marketed is the "just do it" (now) and it is can be fixed later if it isn't quite right. Perhaps it's usually easier with digital but there's little that can be done with a digital file that cannot be done in a darkroom. Either way, it's pay now or pay later, and with the latter the debt collector comes calling . . . sometimes with painfully high interest rates. A couple friends using digital have discovered this the hard way . . . spending considerable time fixing a critical photograph . . . and [re]learning the lesson that it's *always* better to "get it right" in the camera . . . digital or film. -- John Lind ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: RAW, Joel Wilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] New to List, 300mm lens Question, Dean Bielanowski |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: RAW, Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | [OM] New to List, 300mm lens Question, Dean Bielanowski |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |