John:
Does that mean that only early OM2s had prism foam? My OM1, bought in
late 1978, has a >1,xxx,xxx serial, so an OM2 of the same era ought to
be "foam free". I conclude that, at the very least, OM1N and OM2Ns are
free of prism foam.
Martin
John Hermanson wrote:
>OM-1s starting at approx. 1,110,000 serial number had no prism foam.
>
>John Hermanson
>Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
>21 South Lane, Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
>631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
>Olympus OM Service since 1977
><:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <Rene.Glad@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 1:50 AM
>Subject: [OM] Foam deteorisation on prism
>
>
>
>
>>Hi guys and girls!
>>
>>Just opend my first OM1 camera, to clean out the foam-slob from the prism,
>>and of course the prism-paint was spoiled (o:< looking for cheap OM10´s
>>to butcher >:o)
>>
>>I read in some of your comments, that some later production runs did not
>>have the foam installed!
>>As I have some 10 different OM-bodys, I now wonder - do I have to take
>>them all apart, or is there a way, that I can decide if this nasty foam is
>>used or not?
>>
>>
>>Best regards
>>
>>René Glad
>>
>>
>> llll
>> (@ @)
>>--o00-(_)-00o--
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|