John: Thanks. One wonders what Olympus' thought process was at that
time. Guess you win some and lose some... Looks like one OM at least
doesn't have the dreaded prism foam.
Martin
John Hermanson wrote:
>OM-1s starting at approx. 1,110,000 serial number had no prism foam.
>
>John Hermanson
>Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
>21 South Lane, Huntington, NY, 11743-4714,
>631-424-2121, www.zuiko.com
>Olympus OM Service since 1977
><:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <Rene.Glad@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 1:50 AM
>Subject: [OM] Foam deteorisation on prism
>
>
>
>
>>Hi guys and girls!
>>
>>Just opend my first OM1 camera, to clean out the foam-slob from the prism,
>>and of course the prism-paint was spoiled (o:< looking for cheap OM10´s
>>to butcher >:o)
>>
>>I read in some of your comments, that some later production runs did not
>>have the foam installed!
>>As I have some 10 different OM-bodys, I now wonder - do I have to take
>>them all apart, or is there a way, that I can decide if this nasty foam is
>>used or not?
>>
>>
>>Best regards
>>
>>René Glad
>>
>>
>> llll
>> (@ @)
>>--o00-(_)-00o--
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|