Joel: Great stuff. In samples 3 & 4, there is some sizing difference,
but I prefer the 50 f3.5 shot. I think the whites are cleaner, and yes,
more film-like.
Earl
Joel Wilcox wrote:
>I've got a couple images to compare at 16x20, as Chuck N. posed a question
>about the film Zuikos' ability to resolve well enough on a digital sensor
>to compare well with a Zuiko digital lens.
>
>I can't compare primes to primes, but I can compare the 14-54 ZD with my
>50/3.5. The quick report is that the 50/3.5 works great and I thought
>surpassed the 14-54, though the zoom is certainly amazing in close quarters.
>
>I can also confirm Moose's recollection that the guide to "safe" stops with
>the E-1 has to do with the range of stops that exposes more or less
>correctly without special compensation. To use smaller stops I had to
>provide + exposure compensation, which I will gladly do in the future, as
>it is worth the time and trouble.
>
>Here's the link and report:
>
>http://soli.inav.net/~jdub/day/ZD-Zu-bakeoff.html
>
>Sorry if this has been done to death. I don't remember seeing much of this
>kind of thing.
>
>Joel W.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|