At 06:58 PM 4/10/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
> >Thanks for that, Mark. The "look" of the 50/3.5 version is what I am used
> >to, but I was too lazy to do what you did. It is surprising to me that the
> >camera's WB algorthm doesn't render both exactly the same, since the only
> >peek it gets is through the glass.
> >
>Not really, to quote dpreview because it was quicker to find thanan
>online E-1 manual, "the E-1 has automatic white balance which it
>implements using a combination of information from its external white
>balance sensor and captured image data."
Thanks, that would explain it.
>I know I've read about situations where the external WB sensor gets
>tricked by being in light quite different from the subject and throws WB
>off.
>
> >We've also experienced the
> >vignetting at the long end that was discussed a couple weeks ago.
>
>Might be interesting to try the Lens Shading compensation. It adds about
>20+ seconds to write time for SHQ JPEG, but that wouldn't matter for a
>macro setup test. No penalty for RAW shooting and if you have Oly
>Studio, the shading compensation can be done there.
>
>Moose
Will check that out.
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|