Joel Wilcox wrote:
>I've got a couple images to compare at 16x20, as Chuck N. posed a question
>about the film Zuikos' ability to resolve well enough on a digital sensor
>to compare well with a Zuiko digital lens.
>
>I can't compare primes to primes, but I can compare the 14-54 ZD with my
>50/3.5. The quick report is that the 50/3.5 works great and I thought
>surpassed the 14-54, though the zoom is certainly amazing in close quarters.
>
>I can also confirm Moose's recollection that the guide to "safe" stops with
>the E-1 has to do with the range of stops that exposes more or less
>correctly without special compensation.
>
Thanks!
>To use smaller stops I had to
>provide + exposure compensation, which I will gladly do in the future, as
>it is worth the time and trouble.
>
>Here's the link and report:
>
>http://soli.inav.net/~jdub/day/ZD-Zu-bakeoff.html
> <http://soli.inav.net/%7Ejdub/day/ZD-Zu-bakeoff.html>
>Sorry if this has been done to death. I don't remember seeing much of this
>kind of thing.
>
>
That's a great example, quite useful. Pretty much confirms what I've
found with the 300D, that the 5-6mp DSLRs don't exceed the resolution
capabilities of at least the better OM Zuikos.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|