I hope they don't adopt that pretentious little conceit for a naming
system. The old OM naming system seemed kind of rational with
sequential numbering for the models, odd for manual exposure models,
and adding a zero for the consumer level models. What's up with the
current system. E-1 I understand, but E-300? Where is the E-3 it came
from? Are they continuing the E-10, E-20 series with a zero thrown in
for lens interchangeability? And the subtitle. Protect us from future
e-bolts, e-amps, and other electrifying terms. And please don't keep
E-volt like the silly "Rebel" sobriquet.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Feb 6, 2005, at 5:45 AM, Maarten Schulte wrote:
> Is the moment that Olympus will announce the e-2 (or the E-1 mark-II?)
> getting closer?
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|