Subject: | [OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!) |
---|---|
From: | "Simon Worby" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:29:43 -0000 |
Winsor Crosby wrote: >> 'cos with ageing eyes like mine, a split image finder would be a VERY >> great help when using manual lenses like OM Zuikos. We're talking about >> a very small finder and what looks sharp on the screen afterwards often >> is not. And standing there chimping to check focus at 100% size is >> bloody useless unless you're doing landscapes or macro. >> If a split image screen was available at a reasonable cost, I'd fit one >> tomorrow. Early high level EOS bodies had them available. Using the >> Zuik 18mm on a 10D I've had a significant number of focus failures - >> that's why I succumbed and got the Canon 17-40mm. > > Of course the adaptor is just to get you committed. Next you buy > autofocus lenses. But what if you actually *want* to focus manually? Surely people on this list will understand when I say I actively enjoy focussing manually, and when I get the images back which are razor-sharp when projected to 6' x 4', and I can say proudly "I focussed that perfectly"? Like double-declutching on a car with no synchromesh. A perfect gearchange gives you a really warm glow all-over! Simon ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Shooting Glaciers and Snow, Terry and Tracey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!), IanG |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!), Simon Worby |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Canon EOS 300D (OT, in case it wasn't obvious!), Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |