[OM] Re: Zoom

[Piers Hemy]

I had noticed that part of Gord's spec, Moose, but gave more attention in my
response to the "smaller size and weight" criterion.  My feeling is that
going wider will add significantly to the size and weight.  If "wider than
35" is important (and I quite accept that 28 is _much_ wider than 35), then
perhaps two overlapping zooms would be a better compromise, with the Zuiko
28-48 or Tamron SP 24-48 in the frame, both being easily 'pocketable'.  

Piers 

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Moose
Sent: 05 October 2004 20:20
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Zoom

Perhaps folks need to read what you have said you need more carefully. 
Suggestions for 35-xxmm sooms keep coming in when you have said you need
28mm.

--snip


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================