It's sitting right here, about a foot from my right elbow, mounted on an
OM-4 on a tripod - all dressed up and ready to go out. Nice lens. I sure
wish it focused to 1:1.5, to better compete with the Kiron 105/2.8 1:1
for assignments.
If you get desperate, drop me a line. :-)
Moose
Tom Scales wrote:
>I owned both the 100/2 and 90/2 (OK, several of each).
>
>Me, I'm the contrarian. I vastly preferred the 90/2. The 100/2 was, for me,
>useless for portraits as it was TOO sharp. The 90/2 and 100/2.8 were
>bettter. The 90/2 is just so sweet for what I photograph, particularly
>flowers. I miss it. My Nikon 60/2.8 (90/2.8 on the D70/D100) is great, but
>not AS great.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|