Yup. Good idea.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 8/31/2004 at 9:43 PM Andrew Gullen wrote:
>If any competent photographer were to offer either of them better photos
>of
>the same subjects they'd probably be very happy to accept.
>
>Andrew
>
>on 2004/08/31 9:19 PM, Earl Dunbar at edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> I got that from the pages. But a decent digital camera is within the
>budget
>> of any agency or bio department I can imagine! The expertise is another
>> matter, I will concede.
>>
>> On 8/31/2004 at 9:31 AM Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>> Earl lamented:
>>> thanks for the OT links... why is it that when you get very useful text
>>> information from sites and organizations like this, their photos are so
>>> crappy?
>>> ----------------------------
>>> Because the first reference page was produced by a government agency
>>> which has no photographic expertise and NO money to buy images. And the
>>> second reference page was produced by a biology major college student
>>> who probably also has no photographic expertise and NO money to buy
>images.
>>>
>>> If it stops raining today, and I remember, I'll go shoot some close-ups
>>> of the Purple Loosestrife and post them.
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|