Once you're getting a "clear look at the grain" (sampling at better than the
grain "frequency") you're out of the grain-aliasing zone.
Andrew
on 2004/08/15 8:12 AM, R.Jackson at jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Not being a professional or a scientist or anything, I should probably
> shut up, but my own impression is that you don't get a lot more useful
> information out of film by scanning it at super-high resolutions. Yes,
> there's more there to be seen at higher magnifications, but not really
> image data. It seems that you're just getting a clearer look at the
> grain structure past a point.
>
> On Aug 15, 2004, at 1:00 AM, Simon Worby wrote:
>
>> Again, I don't think scanning a negative at 4000 dpi does film any
>> justice at all (please see previous e-mails). It's simply not a level
>> playing field.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|