Subject: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital @ equivalent 9 x 6 print then cropped and enlarged |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:36:06 -0700 |
Hey, that's not fair. I'm only beating him over the head with a 6mp sensor, and here you go weighing in with a bigger form factor and higher mp sensor. :-) Moose IanG wrote: >I sent Simon a couple of small (approx 320x320 pixels) 16-bit crops out of a >couple of 1D2 files. I wasn't too happy with sending jpegs as they simply do >not reflect image quality. > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: ( OM ) Flash at the Olympics, Andrew Gullen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital - for Simon W., Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital @ equivalent 9 x 6 print then cropped and enlarged, IanG |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital @ equivalent 9 x 6 print then cropped and enlarged, IanG |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |