Not being a professional or a scientist or anything, I should probably
shut up, but my own impression is that you don't get a lot more useful
information out of film by scanning it at super-high resolutions. Yes,
there's more there to be seen at higher magnifications, but not really
image data. It seems that you're just getting a clearer look at the
grain structure past a point.
On Aug 15, 2004, at 1:00 AM, Simon Worby wrote:
> Again, I don't think scanning a negative at 4000 dpi does film any
> justice at all (please see previous e-mails). It's simply not a level
> playing field.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|