The main reason for me to change from 10D to E-1 was there is no good lens
for 10D, the 17-40L F4 is ok but range only equal to 28-64mm and it is a F4!
I can't accept a 28-64 F4 that cost me $650! (I will not use Can*n with film
as I found my Zuiko's color are much nicer). There is also no wide angle,
I'm now very happy with the 11-22 which is equal to 22-44 and it fill most
of my needs. I changed to E-1 also for the reason of better skin tone/color
rendering but it could be subjective and not everyone agree.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wilcox, Joel F"
>
> Winsor Crosby wrote:
> > Your stated size requirement is
> > pretty much met
> > by the Canon 300D with kit lens, i.e., about the size of an OM with a
> > small lens.
>
> I followed up by reading dpreview and Steve's on the 300D. I see your
> point.
>
> I'm trying to remember why C.H. Ling said he sold his 10D to get the
> E-1. Whatever it was, the difference between a 10D and E-1 is probably
> less than between an E-1 and a C-5060. Hmmm. Have to go an think about
> it some more ...
>
> How's that 18-55 lens?
>
> Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|