No. I was not happy that they sold it that way when I had been told the wear
and tear was only cosmetic. I just wanted my money back. The glass was in
very good shape though. /jmac
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Jim Brokaw
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:42 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Mystery OM-4 owner, please stand up!
on 6/10/04 6:09 PM, James N. McBride at jnmcbr@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> KEH agreed to refund my money for the 300mm f2.8 with the dented front
> threaded ring. I mailed the lens yesterday so hope they make the refund.
> Especially since I've ordered another lens from that site we all love.
/jmac
Did you check parts availability for a replacement ring...? Just curious, in
case it shows up again at KEH with a really low 'bargain' price...
--
Jim Brokaw
OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|