Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 35 - 70 f3.5 vs f4

Subject: [OM] Re: 35 - 70 f3.5 vs f4
From: "Ali" <farali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:18:38 -0500
That Wyoming plant must have some kind of majic!! 8-))

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Gregg Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:59 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: 35 - 70 f3.5 vs f4



Air at 8000 feet is much less dense, so when the lens was opened while it
was refurbished at the Wyoming plant it lost all the heavier air.

gregg

>I received the Oly Zuiko 35 - 70 f3.5 from 'olympusamerica' (off Eb*y). I
am
> > surprised to find the lens is very light. Do they refurb them and put
all
> > plastic parts in them? I also bought a 35-70 f4 and that is quite
> weighty in
> > comparison to the 35-70 f3.5.



The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"



The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"
        

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz