Subject: | [OM] Re: Cheap OM-3? |
---|---|
From: | "Daniel Sepke" <fred42@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:35:00 -0500 |
I looked at that one too. Decided that it looked like it has been repainted (no white on the Olympus or OM-3). Plus the description put me off that it had been powered up but not tested, not much of a guarantee of anything with that. Couple that with as is with a confusing maybe return policy. I guess it might have been worth a risk at $200 but that would about it for me. Perhaps it is a victim of the point that CH brought up that the good stuff makes it best prices only in the top notch condition (note I *may* wish on my lucky star with this thought ;) Dan S. From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Piers Hemy #3804280974 sold for $205.50. A couple of well-known names were bidding (but did not win). It seems to have gone for a low price, what do you think? Piers The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Cheap OM-3?, Mark Dapoz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Cheap OM-3?, JOHN DUGGAN |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [lens] Re: Cheap OM-3?, PhotoSphere Olympus Camera Service |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Cheap OM-3?, JOHN DUGGAN |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |