Subject: | [OM] Re: 35 - 70 f3.5 vs f4 |
---|---|
From: | Gregg Iverson <golftooter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:58:33 -0500 |
Air at 8000 feet is much less dense, so when the lens was opened while it was refurbished at the Wyoming plant it lost all the heavier air. gregg >I received the Oly Zuiko 35 - 70 f3.5 from 'olympusamerica' (off Eb*y). I am > > surprised to find the lens is very light. Do they refurb them and put all > > plastic parts in them? I also bought a 35-70 f4 and that is quite > weighty in > > comparison to the 35-70 f3.5. The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: LIST-ADMIN stuff: digest distribution, Gary Edwards |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Curious fogging on OM4T, Gregg Iverson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: 35 - 70 f3.5 vs f4, Jim Brokaw |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: 35 - 70 f3.5 vs f4, Ali |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |