Subject: | [OM] Re: Why go digital?? |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:48:08 +1100 |
> > I know that. I didn't say it was "the answer", just a > possibility. With any > medium, you can't bring out what wasn't there on the original > in the first > place. That's common sense. Sorry George, just that some people think you CAN do anything with digital (even those who think they have "common" sense). Anyway, I know I can still get usable prints from colour neg film 3 stops overexposed. ...Wayne The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: New photogalleries - mountains and traditional village-fair, andrew fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Why go digital??, Donald Shedrick |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why go digital??, ClassicVW |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Why go digital??, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |