The workflow to get to a print or display medium can be significantly different
film vs. digital, I'll grant you that. OTOH, I've completely abandoned wet
printing processes, so the back-end of my workflow is the same for either film
or digital, which suits me fine. That give me the ultimate control that I
want. It's the capture, sorting, and storage mechanics that have changed.
Skip
>
>Subject: [OM] Re: Why go digital??
> From: Joel Wilcox <joel-wilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:34:17 -0600
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>>
>Actually, I think I rest my case! ;-)
>
>Seriously, my point is not so much the physical dimensions of film vs.
>digital gear but the significant change in workflow. I pretty much know
>what I'm going to get on film by now and cover the extremes with a certain
>amount of judicious bracketing. I expect one would eventually get to the
>same place with a digital workflow. I'm looking forward to that day, but
>I'm quite happy in the meantime.
>
>Enjoy your new ride. I'm following the reports with great interest.
>
>Joel W.
>
>=
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|