Actually, I have been shooting much more Delta 400 than I would have ever
expected!
I do still shoot a lot of PanF and sometimes K64, but I have found that I am
doing more low light stuff lately and I need all the stops I can get.
I'm not much one for flash.
------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:03:34 EST, NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In a message dated 3/9/04 3:26:25 PM Central Standard Time,
> agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>
> > Would I recommend this camera to other Zuikoheads desperately
> > trying to wait out the DSLR purchase as long as possible? In a
> > heartbeat. There are a few oddball nuances, and noise at the
> > higher ISOs is disastrous,
>
>
> It would be interesting to know how many of us really use the higher ISO
> films with our OMs. I've been back seriously doing some photography for
> about 3
> 1/2 years and most of what I have been doing is in the 50-100 ISO range. Yes,
> I
> shoot a fair amount of Tri-X, however almost all of my color work is done
> below 200 ISO. So the question becomes, "Does the noise at higher ISOs
> really
> make any difference given the way I use my camera?" I don't know the answer
> because I'm not yet digital, however it might be interesting to hear from
> folks
> about the magnitude of the noise "problem". Bill Barber
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
> List Problem"
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|