I don't mind this long running OT thread but would someone at least
please change the subject
Chuck Norcutt
Tris Schuler wrote:
> Not everything in the mysterious world of audiophiles makes good sense.
> Indeed, if it had not been for the groundbreaking work of Pearson and a few
> others like him (and I stress few) product such as Advent, just for
> example, would have been likely looked down on as well--indeed, ridiculed
> for its modest price alone, not to mention its "laughable" two-way
> architecture.
>
> Bose 901s are not perfect loudspeaker systems. And I have more news: no
> other speaker system is perfect, either. _All_ loudspeakers represent
> compromises, that's a given, and here's a second given: you could do a
> whole lot worse than to own a pair of 901s.
>
> Having said that, the Infinity Golds in my Grand Cherokee beat the pants
> off that costly Bose system my brother has in his Cadillac. For _my_ money
> at least. But what could I know--my ears listen to RCA every morning.
>
> Tris
>
> At 09:30 PM 3/5/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>>"BOSE" is a bad word in audiophile circles -- and with good reason I
>>suspect. BA is fine -- look at Paradigm too.
>>
>>Craig
>
>
>
> The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
> To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
> List Problem"
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|