Yeah, I've looked around, but seen nothing about what it all means.
Gary's tests showed what could be a slight edge for the earlier version,
but really no meaningful difference within his criteria. And, of course,
that's only one sample of each.
Moose
GMcGrath@xxxxxxx wrote:
>Here's the non-HTML version:
>
>Just thought I'd remind that there was apparently a change in the lens at s/n
>500,000. Don't know if it makes much difference in performance, though.
>Greg
>
>
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|