On February 17, 2004 19:11, John Hermanson wrote:
> No, the 35-105 does not have that problem, you may be thinking of the
> 65-200.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Skip Williams" <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Hasn't there been a problem with many of these lenses having defective or
> > degrading rear element groups?
> > If so, examine the lenses closely.
So, what exactly is happening to the 65-200 lens elements? Is it inevitable
that this will happen to all these lenses due to some sort of decay process,
or are there specific (avoidable) conditions that precipitate this?
It would be ever so comforting to know that only a close encounter with haggis
fumes, or cosmic irradiation at high altitude, or storage alongside AF
equipment, or photographing reptiles in distress while expleting "Crikey,
lookit'er, isn't she a Beaut!" could initiate this irreversible lens decline.
--
Parzival Herzog
The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus
List Problem"
|