One other thing to note, the 85/2 uses 49mm filters vs the 55mm filters
used on the 100/2. My "indoor low light" kit consists of a 28/2,
50/1.8, and 85/2, a very compact set of lenses that all use 49mm
filters. (Or at least did until the 28 got dropped over the holidays -
now it does not use filters, the filter ring is dented!) :)
Jim Couch
Skip Williams wrote:
SNIP
That said, I like the 85/2 over the 100/2 as the 85/s smaller size means a lot
to me. In fact, I prefer the 90/2 over the 100/2, as I find the macro
capability a big plus. And I didn't notice a significant difference in
performance between the 90/2 and 100/2 in my cursory evaluation of the two
lenses.
SNIP
Skip
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|