That's not a very carmudgeonly response AndrewFf ...
Chris
On 5 Dec 2003, at 09:16, andrew fildes wrote:
Yes I know (sigh) - failed on the grounds of intellectuality.
AndrewF
Sorry, AndrewF and John. I think know what he meant too, but for a
politician at a press conference that's a failed speech. Anyway,
what he thought he knew, he didn't (e.g. a nuclear or biological
capability - I don't count chemical weapons as WMD).
Chris
On 3 Dec 2003, at 23:09, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 07:28:51 +1100, andrew fildes
<afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This bothers me. I know he got an award for unintelligibility for
this but it actually makes perfect sense to me.
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|