Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] What Rumsfeld knows

Subject: Re: [OM] What Rumsfeld knows
From: "James N. McBride" <jnmcbr@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:24:20 -0700
It does make perfect sense to those who think about what they read. Ha, I
just noticed my spell checker wants to replace "Rumsfeld" with "Rusted".
Some old rusted things still work pretty good. /jim

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of andrew fildes
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 1:29 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] What Rumsfeld knows


Walt appended...

>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>"...as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know
>we know.  We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say,
>we know there are some things we do not know.  But there are also
>unknown unknowns, the ones we don't know we don't know." -- Donald
Rumsfeld

This bothers me. I know he got an award for unintelligibility for
this but it actually makes perfect sense to me. It's clearer than a
lot of epistemological ideas I deal with. Have I been teaching
Philosophy for too long? Can we really know anything? Should I seek
therapy?
AndrewF
(I know I left my mind here somewhere..)

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz