Actually, it's exactly the opposite. Condenser enlargers are
generally sharper and contrastier. Diffusion enlargers minimize
the effects of dust and scratches on the negative.
Walt
__________________________________________________________________
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it
from religious conviction." -- Blaise Pascal, theologian
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: petertje@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:04:30 +0200
>I was told that non-condenser enlargers are better for sharpness.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|