Subject: | Re: [OM] Panorama Shots (QTVR) using OM-system |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:04:17 -0400 |
Cc: | olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Having only 1/3 of the frame is a significant loss of detail. However,
if the only use of the image is for the web it's probably more than
adequate.
Alexander Schrieken wrote: > Since I need to 'unwarp' the image using special software, the film needs to be scanned. Having the mirror cover such a small erea causes a significant loss of resolution... (At least when scanning with an Epson 2400 PHOTO.) < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 35RC - how to take top off?, John Hermanson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 35RC - how to take top off?, Thomas Bryhn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Panorama Shots (QTVR) using OM-system, Alexander Schrieken |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Panorama Shots (QTVR) using OM-system, Alexander Schrieken |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |