Subject: | RE: [OM] An observation |
---|---|
From: | "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:48:40 +0100 |
I don't think you are anywhere near qualifying Thomas - but I don't think Walt is wrong. Piers -----Original Message----- From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Haegin Sent: 15 August 2003 14:33 To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [OM] An observation Jim, Walt, > the title of list > asshole is up for grabs. I'm new to the list, but I sincerely hope that I'm not in contention. Thomas < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] A quick E-1 poll, Piers Hemy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] An observation, whunter |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] An observation, Thomas Haegin |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] An observation, Geilfuss Charles |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |