I have not tried those other combinations, and am not sure I would
have the patience or time.....maybe someday. I have compared the two
zooms without the 2X converters, and the Zuiko comes out sharper,
most evident at the edges.
--- ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> In <20030811221559.3589.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 08/11/03
>
> at 03:15 PM, Donald Shedrick <shedridc@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> >I have tried a few shots with the 75 - 150 with the 2XA, and it is
> very good.
> >(much better than my Vivitar 70 - 150 with 2X matched multiplier).
>
>
> I find this interesting, since the Vivitar w/o its matched
> multiplier was
> considered the sharper lens when both were first issued. The
> performance
> of the Vivitar with its matched multiplier was not as sterling as
> without
> the multiplier.
>
> How does the Vivitar behave with the Zuiko 2x mutiplier as compared
> with
> the Vivitar matched multiplier? or have you tried this combination?
>
> And, to be symmetrical, what is the performance of the Zuiko 70-150
> with
> the Vivitar multiplier vs the Zuiko multiplier?
>
> Now, class...all together....[grin]
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
=====
Don Shedrick
http://groups.msn.com/firstlightimaging
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|