on 11/08/2003 11:51, Skip Williams at om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I wouldn't buy the 180/2.8, personally, with it's chromatic aberration.
Good thing one never stops learning things. Now I feel lucky because when
decided to buy my /4, the 180/2.8 didn't exist. When first noticed it, I
thought I should have waited until... Never used one, neither even seen one.
When subscribed to this list some months ago, noone even talked about it.
Where or how did you get that chomatic aberration info?
Regards,
Fernando.
PS: I recognize I exagerated a bit about sharpness of the 200/4 + 2X-A
combination... some seagull eye was not as round as it should have been,
tripod mounted at 1/250 f8 (16)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|