Subject: | Re: [OM] 200 or 300mm Zuiko prime? |
---|---|
From: | Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Aug 2003 23:22:44 -0700 |
> > > If you were to pick a 200 or 300, and only > > >one, which would you pick? > 300/4. i find it is very easy to use and not too heavy, well balanced unlike the big 300/2.8 Tamron. Works well with the 2xa or 1.4xa. I use it with a monopod or hand held. mike < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] 200 or 300mm Zuiko prime?, James N. McBride |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] TAMRON 35-80 mm F2.8 SP adaptall??, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200 or 300mm Zuiko prime?, NSURIT |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200 or 300mm Zuiko prime?, Skip Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |