> I'll agree on the Tokina also. I've found it sharper than the Zuiko. That
might
> make it too sharp, which some say is a bad thing.
>
> Those spending 5 or 8 times the Tokina price usually have to come up with
some
> "you get what you pay for" bokeh type comment that is simply incorrect
here. The
> difference of F2 - F2.5 is not anywhere near $600 (or more).
>
> Larry
>
> Geilfuss Charles wrote:
>
> > Wayne, I don't think you would go wrong with the Tamron nor with the
> > Tokina/2.5 Macro. I have the latter and love it. Albert speaks very
highly
> > of his as well.
> >
> > Charlie Geilfuss
Rather than the Zuiko 90/2, I'd probably have more fun with the Tokina 90mm
and a new Oly 5050 for about the same price. But can't afford them all just
now.
Wayne
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|